As many of you may or not know, there is a series of
segments covered by CNN in which reports essentially “Crossfire” arguments on a
range of topics. This week the subject matter happened to be the involvement of
the United States in foreign country specifically Syria. This debate brought up
many questions we had discussed in class lecture and it explored the negativity
and importance of interaction with such countries other than ourselves.
While I
agree that in times of strife and need; the necessary importance for our
assistance can be overwhelming desired, but what is the outcome of our help?
Does our help truly, help. The entire “Crossfire” covers that question. While
in class lecture we discussed the vital and factual evidence of our assistance
we did not discuss the level to which the country depends on us. Or for that
matter the ignorance we have as Americans in trying to help. In this certain discussion an overwhelming
amount of critics and live twitter users roughly eight-five percent of viewers
stated that we should not go into Syria and assist them. Now does that make our
nation an awful selfish one or does it make us a smart geared one. The debate
brings up the conversation over America being the “World’s Police” and whether
or not that’s an admirable signifier.
http://crossfire.blogs.cnn.com/2014/02/17/should-the-u-s-stay-out-of-syria/
Good point! I can see definite linkages to the readings. Which reading in particular were you discussing here?
ReplyDelete